Women s Views On The Church Essay - 748 Words

One of the most debated issues in the church is whether women can be pastors or elders in the church. The egalitarian view is one in which women can lead, teach, preach, and be pastors of the local church. There is also no roles defined in the family for husband and wife according to this view. The wife can be the head of the home and is equal or superior to her husband. Aida Besancon Spencer, a minister in the Presbyterian Church writes, â€Å"God created woman to be ‘in front of’ or ‘visible’ to Adam, which would symbolize equality in all respects. Even more, one can argue that the female is the helper who rules over the one she helps!† The egalitarian view sees no distinction in roles between husband and wife, and leadership within the church for the male or female. The complementarian view makes a distinction between the roles of husband and wife in marriage, and within the church men can lead, teach, preach, and be pastors. Women are forbidden f rom these roles. There are clearly defined roles in the Scriptures for the husband and wife. The husband is to be the head of the home while the wife submits to her husband. The husband is to be a servant-leader because that is how Christ demonstrated leadership. The wife is to willingly and lovingly submit to her husband and to be his helper. Even though there are roles distinguished the husband and wife are equal spiritually. The husband is not superior to his wife, and the wife is not inferior to her husband. The roles areShow MoreRelatedThe Welcome Table by Alice Walker1568 Words   |  7 Pagesher. The beginning of the story is told from the white people s perspectives as they see an old black woman come to their church and go inside. Inside the church, the point of view switches to the usher who tells the old black lady to leave. The point of view then switches back to the white women inside the church, who take it as a personal insult and feel the most threatened about the o ld black lady being at their church. They rouse their husbands to throw the old lady out. The perspective thenRead MoreThe Modern Pro Life : A Normative Critique1615 Words   |  7 Pagestherefore has a right to life. The pro-life movement includes a variety of organizations, with no single centralized decision-making body. In the United States, the movement is associated with several Christian religious groups, especially the Catholic Church, and is frequently, but not exclusively, allied with the Republican Party. The movement is also supported by non-mainstream pro-life feminists. The movement seeks to reverse Roe v. Wade and to promote legislative changes or constitutional amendmentsRead MoreSusan T. Foh s The Christian Faith865 Words   |  4 PagesComplementarity in the Christian faith is the belief that, God has created men and women equal in their essential dignity and human personhood, but different and complementary in function with male headship in the home and in the Church. This view of gender roles is drawn from Biblical interpretations and emphasizes the equality as well as the valuable dissimilarities of men and women. Susan T. Foh, a Christian author, has redefined the concept of complementarity in her own terms, coining the phraseRead MoreA Reflection On My Faith1496 Words   |  6 Pagesone, in an individual person or a group. You can have faith in oneself, humanity as whole, or one’s god. Tilley refers to Faith as â€Å"the relationship between one and irreducible energizing source of meaning a center of value in one’s life.† Others may view that you can have faith in anything not just what Tilley stated like objects, media, and something else that many people state they have faith in is countries. Some may have faith in a â€Å"Christian America†, which Baxter explains is faith that we areRead MoreThe Church Of Trinity Fellowship903 Words   |  4 Pages The church I decided to study was St. Luke Presbyterian Church in Amarillo, Texas. I selected this church because my best friend attends this church and I sought to go out of my norm and learn more about my friend’s religious background. I normally attend the non-denominational church of Trinity Fellowship. I am considered to be a Conservative and my friend is a Liberal. M any Presbyterian churches in Amarillo are liberal, but the majority of Presbyterian churches are known to be conservative becauseRead MoreJanice Cornwell. Pyyc-400 Adult Relationship. Instructor:Dr.1197 Words   |  5 PagesJanice Cornwell PYYC-400 Adult Relationship Instructor: Dr. Debra Yoder April 4, 2017 Intervention by Faith Communities Violence against Women The total number of the different religious communities in the United States may never be complete. A large number of us live within some type of religious belief system. The First Amendment of the Constitution makes clear what Congress cannot do related to religious organizations. It allows us a freedom of exercise that some countries are stillRead MoreThe Major Moral Problem That Human s Face Essay897 Words   |  4 Pagesevil, their different opinions separate their views on identifying exactly what should be right? Little expresses the problem as we cannot agree on what would be right or good for society...by people whose fundamental views of reality are radically opposed to the Church s (23). What is our true source of knowledge of good and evil? The true source of knowledge for most people is the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. But to Joyce A. Little, it s not the knowledge in itself, but the qualityRead MoreEarly Church Fathers Attitudes Toward Women Essay811 Words   |  4 PagesChapter 6 Early Church Fathers’ Attitudes Toward Women â€Å"Then, as the church became fused with the secular, misogynistic society of Rome, Christ’s attitude toward women and the doctrine of equality were purposely forgotten,† 21, 34 Following are only a few of the mean-spirited quotes made by the early church so-called fathers and from modern preachers. This researcher believes this kind of leadership has instigated erroneous beliefs about women and their place in the Christian church. FurthermoreRead MoreMoral In The Canterbury Tales1221 Words   |  5 Pagesfight over the coins and die, the Pardoner is gaining money from the church. Ultimately, money makes the story go around and everything that happens, basically happens because of money. Numerous historical problems were due to the fact of money. For example, the corruption of churches was a major problem. There were several reasons for corruption, however, the main cause of the selling indulgences (â€Å"Corruption in Medieval Church† 1). The selling of indulgences and the corruption of churches may haveRead MoreWomen s Christian Temperance Movement Essay1385 Words   |  6 PagesThe recently formed Women s Christian Temperance Movement (WCTU) took up the campaign for the vote in 1885. The movement was strongly linked to church and had the motto ‘For God, Home and Humanity.’ The WCTU had previously been involved in a temperance movement and this was one of the main reasons they decided to campaign for the vote. According to Wood â€Å"social climate had the greatest effect on mobilising women into a combined effort to rid themselves of laws that discriminated against them. Drunkenness

Teens And The Contrivenation Program In The Juvenile...

All programs have limitations to them and they are not all perfect. Downs, Robertson and Harrison did a study on the diversion program and the effectiveness it had in helping drug abusers. They observed 127 clients total, ages 13-17. They found that the diversion program they used with these adolescents was not effective and led to negative self-labels and more deviant behavior. They found that some adolescents that were sent to this program were not heavy drug users and had family issues, but due to the program being drug based it led to the negative self-label of drug abuser. This program didn’t have many restorative aspects to it. Diversion programs for juveniles should be separate from juveniles who need support to fix a drug addiction†¦show more content†¦The frontal lobe of the brain is involved in many things two of the most important things that relate to juvenile delinquency are their problem-solving skills and moral judgment skills. The myelination and pruni ng of the brain has been found to continue well into mid-20’s (Arnett,2017). This is one of the first lessons that lawmakers and people in society need to learn. The other issue that lawmakers, judges and society need to be aware of is the effects of labeling. Labeling can affect a juvenile throughout their lives. In the Idaho code 20-509 it says that once a juvenile is tried as an adult they will always be tried as an adult. Labeling a juvenile as an adult in the eye of the law could possibly lead to recidivism. Downs, Robertson and Harrison discuss that one of the repercussions of a more deviant label can increase the likelihood of more deviant behavior in the future. Deviant labels can weaken a juvenile’s bonds to society, there are less possibilities for jobs, and it could leads to a juvenile to have a harder time in school (Downs, Robertson Harrison, 1997). When there is a weakened connection to the community you run in to the juvenile giving up trying to conform to the expectations set out for them. As described in Merton’s General Strain theory and innovation. When people feel like they don’t have the

SHOCK INCARCERATION Essay Example For Students

SHOCK INCARCERATION Essay Miranda WarningsYou have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during police questioning, if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you by the state. These words have preceded every arrest since Miranda v. Arizona 1966, informing every detained person of his rights before any type of formal police questioning begins. This issue has been a hot topic for decades causing arguments over whether or not the Miranda Warnings should or should not continue to be part of police practices, and judicial procedures. In this paper, the author intends to explore many aspects of the Miranda Warnings including; definition, history, importance to society, constitutional issues, and pros and cons of having the Miranda Warnings incorporated into standard police procedures. The Miranda Warning, is the requirement set forth by the United States Supreme Cou rt in Miranda v. Arizona June 13, 1966 that prior to the time of arrest and any interrogation of a person suspected of a crime, he/she must be told that he/she has: the right to remain silent, the right to be told that anything he/she said while in custody can and will be used against him/her in a court of law, and that he/she has the right to legal counsel. The Miranda Warnings inform the arrested of constitutional rights and are intended to prevent self-incrimination in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (Neubauer 2002). The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution states No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case t o be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation (Murphy1996). By neglecting to inform a suspect of his Constitutional rights the due course of legal proceedings according to the rules and forms established for the protection of rights has been violated. In other words, the suspect has been denied his right to protection from being unjustly deprived of life and liberty for failure to abide by due process of law (Ivers 2002). The Constitution reserves several rights for suspects of a crime. One of the fears of the authors of the U.S. Constitution was that the government could act however it wanted to by saying that an individual was a suspected criminal. Just by a person being suspected of committing a crime doesnt necessarily mean that their Constitutional rights are waived. The rights set forth by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are design ed to ensure that those accused of a crime are assured of those rights (Mount 2003). Years ago police were able to take advantage of the fact that not everyone knows their rights by heart. In fact, it is likely that most people could only name a few of their rights as accused criminals, but not all of them. Law enforcements position at the time was that if the accused, for example, spoke about a crime without knowing that they did not need to, that it was the persons fault for disclosing the information and not invoking their fifth amendment right (Frieden 1999). Disclosing information without knowledge of his rights was the center of the issue in Miranda v. Arizona. In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping an 18 year-old mentally challenged woman. He was taken in by authorities for questioning and signed a confession to the crime. Which, turned out to be the states only piece of evidence linking him to the crime. Miranda was not told that he did not have to spe ak or that he could have a lawyer present during his questioning. At trial, Mirandas lawyer tried to get the confession thrown out, however, the motion was denied. In 1966 the case came before the Supreme Court. The Court ruled that the statements made to police could not be used as evidence because Ernesto Miranda was not informed of his Constitutional rights (Miranda v. Arizona 1966). In a series of four cases, one case being Miranda v. Arizona in which the defendant was questioned by law enforcement in a room where he was cut of from the outside world. None of the defendants in any of the four cases was given a full and effective warning of his rights at the outset of the interrogation process. In all of the cases the questioning elicited oral admissions, and in three of them signed statements as well, which were admitted at their trials. All four cases ended with convictions. The Supreme Court held: 1.the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, st emming from questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way, unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the Fifth Amendments privilege against self-incrimination (Miranda v. Arizona 1966). The Court also felt that the atmosphere and environment in which interrogation took place was inherently intimidating and worked to undermine the privilege against self-incrimination. Certain preventive measures needed to be taken to dispel the compulsion inherent in custodial surroundings, otherwise no statement obtained from a defendant could truly be the product of free choice. The defendants right against self-incrimination, is the essential mainstay of the United States adversary system and guarantees to the individual the right to remain silent unless he chooses to speak in the unfettered exercise of his own will, during a period of custodial int errogation as well as in the courts or during the course of other official investigations (Miranda v. Arizona 1966). automotive Essay3. Miranda v. Arizona: Certiorari to The Supreme Court of Arizona. (1966). United States Supreme Court. Retrieved April 23, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Miranda/4.. Mount, S. (2003). The Miranda Warning. Retrieved Saturday May 1, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.usconstitution.net/miranda.html5. Murphy, G. (1996, October 16). Historical Documents: The Bill of Rights. Cleveland Free-Net. Retrieved April 23, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.lcweb2.loc.gov/const/bor.html6. Neubauer, D.W. (2002). Americas Courts and the Criminal Justice System. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth: Thomson Learning.